Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Hyeon Chung vs Maximilian Marterer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chung vs Marterer analysis and find out who is favored!
Hyeon Chung vs Maximilian Marterer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Chung 1 - 0 Marterer
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chung has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Marterer has won 49.58%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chung, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Marterer has won 49.93%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 24.51% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chung has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Marterer has saved 55.75% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chung has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Marterer winning 57.97% (W/L 40/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chung has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 194/ 88), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 2/ 8). Marterer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 69/ 46), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 14/ 14).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chung winning 1 times and Marterer being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Chung winning 2 and Marterer winning 1. The last match between Chung and Marterer was at the BMW Open - Munich, 02-05-2017, First, Clay with Hyeon Chung getting the victory 7-6(10) 4-6 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:17:57.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chung and Marterer have played a deciding set 1 times, with Chung winning 1 times and Marterer 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Chung winning 1, and Marterer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chung has played against opponents with an average rank of while Marterer has played against players with an average rank of 272.01.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chung has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Marterer has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chung has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Marterer has converted 40% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
499
Rank
19
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
87
Rank
45
High
29
Age
L
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
65% (243-132)
Career Total W/L
59% (386-268)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
33% (9-18)
$2,529,406
Career Prize Money
$1,652,045
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Hyeon Chung vs Maximilian Marterer For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Chung VS Marterer
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Hyeon Chung | Maximilian Marterer |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 10 |
| DFs Total | 4 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:17:57 | 2:17:57 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (66/101) | 75% (80/106) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (51/66) | 71% (57/80) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 66% (23/35) | 58% (15/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 17% (1/6) | 25% (1/4) |
| Return Points W% | 32% (34/106) | 27% (27/101) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(10) 4-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Hyeon Chung
Player
Maximilian Marterer
65%
(
66 of
101)
1st Serve %
75%
(
80 of
106)
4
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
57 of
80)
66%
(
23 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
27 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
34 of
106)
108
Total Points Won
99
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Hyeon Chung | Maximilian Marterer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (9/18) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 38% (24/39) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 46% (278/321) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 38% (3/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 38% (5/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.41 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 120 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 66 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:42:33 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 244.96 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 63% (1203/1913) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (812/1203) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (352/710) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 40% (52/130) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 35% (620/1792) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 29% (4/10) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 35% (8/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/3) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 78% (9/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 22% (9/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 11% (18/2) |
Hyeon Chung Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Hyeon Chung
65%
(
15 of
23)
1st Serve %
55%
(
17 of
31)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
11 of
15)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
39%
(
9 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
36
Total Points Won
18
|
6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Dimitar Kuzmanov
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
75%
(
61 of
81)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Hyeon Chung
50%
(
12 of
24)
1st Serve %
71%
(
15 of
21)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
58%
(
7 of
12)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
46%
(
11 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
26
Total Points Won
19
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nuno Borges
Player
Hyeon Chung
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andy Murray
Player
Hyeon Chung
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
92%
(
12 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Hyeon Chung
63%
(
57 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
99)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
28 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordan Thompson
Player
Hyeon Chung
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Renzo Olivo
Player
Hyeon Chung
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
47%
(
36 of
77)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
11
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
12 of
41)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
48%
(
36 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Baptiste Crepatte
48%
(
34 of
71)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
84)
1
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
2
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
9 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
48%
(
34 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
46 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jozef Kovalik
Player
Hyeon Chung
35%
(
24 of
69)
1st Serve %
38%
(
24 of
64)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
10
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
42%
(
19 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
32 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Maximilian Marterer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Maximilian Marterer
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Luke Saville
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Maximilian Marterer
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
15
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
85%
(
40 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
20%
(
12 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Maximilian Marterer
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Daniel Masur
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Maximilian Marterer
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
67 of
111)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
84%
(
48 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
42 of
67)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
22%
(
18 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
49 of
111)
114
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Jordan Thompson
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
49 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Maximilian Marterer
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve %
49%
(
21 of
43)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
15 of
23)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
12 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
40
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 0-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Maximilian Marterer
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Richard Gasquet
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
92%
(
11 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
7 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
18 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Chung Vs Marterer Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Chung are available here and Marterer photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
